How to read the evidence
Evidence labels
- Official: supported by an Epic announcement, within that announcement's scope.
- In-game tested: backed by a reproducible test record, with version, conditions and evidence.
- Reported: described by a media or community source; not a test performed by this site.
- Disputed: sources disagree or a claim conflicts with available evidence.
- Unverified: sufficient supporting evidence has not been established.
- Outdated: retained for context after its applicability has ended or changed.
These labels describe evidence, not a guarantee of accuracy. Competitor pages found during research do not establish game rules. See Sources for the current register and each entry's limits.
Unknowns and disagreements
An unknown probability stays unknown. A missing event time is not midnight, and a missing end time cannot establish that an event has finished. Conflicting reports belong together beside the affected claim, with their sources and limits visible.
A claim of testing needs reviewable material. AI or developer drafting does not qualify as in-game testing, and multiple articles citing the same footage do not become independent tests.
Review dates and corrections
Review dates should record actual evidence checks. A rebuild does not create a new review or substantive update. The source register was manually reviewed ; no in-game testing was performed, so reported and unverified claims keep those labels.
Corrections should identify the page, disputed sentence and supporting evidence. An accepted correction should update the affected claim, its evidence status and any related tool data; unresolved disagreements should remain visible. Use Contact & corrections to check whether the mailbox is available. No response time is promised.
See About for the current editor identity status.